MCP Server Development Services

MCP Servers That Actually Run in Production

Build secure MCP servers that connect AI agents to your business systems with authentication, permissions, observability, and audit-ready controls.

MCP Server Architecture

LIVE

Client / Host Connection

Tool & Resource Discovery

Auth & Permission Scoping

System & Data Integration

Years Building Enterprise AI

0 +

Customers and End Clients

0 +

100+

Engineers and Specialists

4–12 Wks

Discovery to Production

Trusted by Enterprise Teams in Regulated Industries

What It Is

What Is MCP, and What Does an MCP Server Do?

MCP is the standard way to connect AI assistants to your business systems.

Who made it. Anthropic released the Model Context Protocol as an open standard in November 2024. OpenAI and Google have since adopted it.

What it replaces. MCP replaces one-off custom integrations. Before MCP, connecting AI to a new system meant writing custom code for that specific connection. With MCP, you build a server once, and any MCP-compatible AI can use it. The MCP server is what RTS builds.

What it isn’t. MCP is not a product. It is a standard. An MCP server is what follows the standard.

Why it matters now. A system built to the MCP standard today works with any MCP-compatible AI assistant, now and as the landscape changes.

What an MCP Server Gives an AI to Work With

Every MCP server exposes some combination of three things:

Tools

Actions the AI can take — look up a claim status, send an email, update a record. The AI decides when to call a tool; the user approves the action.

Resources

Information the AI can read — a customer record, a policy PDF, a sales report. Read-only context the AI uses to answer questions or make decisions.

Prompts

Pre-written templates a user can trigger — “Draft a denial letter,” “Summarize last quarter.” The user picks the template; the AI fills it in using live data.

What a Tool Looks Like in Real Code

@mcp.tool()
async def lookup_claim_status(claim_id: str) -> dict:
    """Returns the status of a claim. Checks the user has permission first."""
    return await claims_service.get(claim_id, user=ctx.user)

Python example — illustrative.

The Hard Truth

Why MCP Servers Fail in Production

Most MCP guides end at ‘hello world.’ Production is where the real problems start. These are the six patterns RTS encounters most often.

01

Stuck in Demo Mode

Your team built a working MCP demo. Six months later it still isn’t connected to the real claims database. Tutorial code doesn’t survive real authentication, real permissions, or real load.

02

Security Was an Afterthought

The server uses one shared key to access your systems. There’s no way to tell which user asked the AI to do what. Works in dev; fails the first security review.

03

Flying Blind in Production

The server is live, but nobody knows which tool calls are slow, failing, or running up cost. The first warning sign is a customer complaint.

04

Locked Into One AI Provider

The integration was built directly against one LLM provider. Switching means rewriting everything — the whole point of MCP was to avoid this.

05

One Customer Sees Another's Data

The server returns whatever the AI asks for, but the check on who’s allowed to see what lives somewhere else. One badly-scoped tool, one cross-tenant leak, and compliance is involved.

06

Still Figuring Out Where to Start?

MCP servers are the standard integration layer for AI Automation and a critical control surface for AI Governance. If you’re deciding which comes first, start there.

What We Build

What RTS Delivers

Six service areas. Each is a complete deliverable — working as a full program or as a targeted engagement where a specific gap exists.

01

MCP Readiness Assessment

A 2-week look at where you are. We map your AI systems, target integrations, and auth requirements. Output: a prioritized build-vs-buy recommendation and architecture decision doc.

02

Custom MCP Server Development

A production MCP server built for your specific systems — claims, contracts, CRM, ERP, fleet, property data. Written in your preferred language. Ready for real traffic from day one.

03

Authentication and Authorization

The security layer most tutorials skip. Per-user auth, role-based access, tenant separation, full audit logging. SOC 2, HIPAA, and FedRAMP-aware patterns where required.

04

Multi-Tenant MCP Architecture

MCP servers for SaaS products where every customer’s data has to stay separate. Access rules enforced at the tool layer, not just the application layer.

05

MCP Observability and Operations

Monitoring, error tracking, and cost dashboards wired into your existing observability tools — Datadog, Grafana, Splunk, or whatever your team already runs.

06

MCP Server Audit and Hardening

Already built one in-house? We review for security gaps, performance issues, and multi-tenant safety. We tell you what’s ready and fix what’s not.

How the Architecture Works

The AI assistant never talks to your systems directly. It goes through the MCP server.

The MCP server is the control point. It handles authentication (who is asking), authorization (what they are allowed to do), the actual call to your system, and the audit log entry for everything that happened. Your internal systems stay behind that layer.

AI Assistant

Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, your app

MCP Client

Built into the AI assistant

MCP Server (RTS-built)

Auth | Tools | Resources | Audit log

Your Systems

CRM, ERP, claims, contracts, databases

Transport note: Local MCP servers use STDIO. Remote production servers use HTTP+SSE. RTS designs for the transport that fits your deployment model.
Industry Playbooks

MCP Servers for Regulated Industries

MCP servers for regulated industries require more than connectivity — the auth model, audit trail, and compliance controls the industry demands. RTS has 14+ years in exactly these four verticals.

Financial Services

  • Loan origination MCP — credit scoring, document classification, decisioning
  • Fraud detection MCP — real-time signal aggregation across systems
  • AML/KYC MCP — entity resolution, sanctions screening, audit-ready logging
  • Customer-360 MCP — unified view across CRM, transactions, support
  • Compliance reporting MCP — SR 11-7 evidence and audit packages
client outcome

40%

Improvement in forecast accuracy, plus 35% better resource optimization — asset management & financial advisory client

Insurance​

  • Claims status MCP — status, notes, and history lookup across claims systems
  • Underwriting data MCP — risk data, policy history, third-party feed access
  • Policy document MCP — retrieval and summarization for agents and customers
  • FNOL automation MCP — first-notice-of-loss intake into claims systems
  • Customer service MCP — full-context access across policy admin and account systems
client outcome

40%

Increase in customer satisfaction after deploying AI-powered customer service connected to policy and account systems — HSA Trustee

Logistics

  • Fleet operations MCP — vehicle location, status, maintenance, driver data
  • Freight pricing MCP — real-time rate lookup and quote generation
  • Track and trace MCP — shipment status and exception retrieval
  • Carrier onboarding MCP — document collection and verification
  • Inventory forecasting MCP — demand signal retrieval and reporting
client outcome

18%

Revenue increase — plus 31% fewer empty miles and 12x faster truck load times — top-50 US freight broker

Real Estate & Construction

  • Contract review MCP — multi-document comparison and red-flag detection
  • Property data MCP — records, valuation, and market comps with access controls
  • Tenant portal MCP — maintenance requests, lease queries, account management
  • Construction document MCP — drawing, spec, and submittal retrieval
  • Investment analysis MCP — portfolio and deal data for AI-assisted underwriting
client outcome

30%

Better demand forecast accuracy — plus 25% less overstocking and 20% fewer supply-chain disruptions — fiberglass manufacturer

Our Methodology

The RTS MCP Sprint

A defined 5-stage delivery methodology. Each stage has a named output engineering buyers can use to plan their team’s involvement.

01

Discover

Wk 1–2

Map AI systems, target integrations, auth requirements, and compliance constraints. Output: architecture decision document.

02

Design

Wk 2–4

Design the server — which tools, which resources, transport choice, auth model, multi-tenant boundaries. Output: tech spec ready for build.

03

Build

Wk 3–8

Implement, test, and integrate with target systems. Code review, integration tests. Output: working server in staging.

04

Harden

Wk 6–10

Security review, performance testing, multi-tenant testing, observability wiring. Output: production-ready server with runbook.

05

Operate

Wk 10–24+

Live monitoring of tool-call latency, errors, and cost. Drift detection. New tools as the AI footprint grows, MCP spec tracking, and LLM provider switching without rewriting. Optional managed operations.

“Every stage of the MCP Sprint exists because we’ve seen what happens without it. Skip Harden and security findings surface in production. Skip Design and the tools don’t match what the AI actually needs. The methodology is the lesson list from 600+ engagements compressed into a repeatable process.”

Sandhya Ramamurthy — Director of Data Engineering, RTS Labs

The Security Layer

The Production Security Model

Most MCP tutorials do not cover security. Production MCP servers require a full security model. Here is what RTS builds into every production server.

Authentication

Every user gets their own token. The MCP server knows who is asking. No shared service keys, no anonymous access.

OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, refresh handling, and session isolation across tenants.

Authorization

Permission checks live inside the MCP server. When the AI calls a tool on behalf of a user, the server checks what that user is allowed to see. The application layer and database are not the control point. The server is.

Audit Log

Every action the AI takes is logged: who asked, what was called, what came back, and when. Exportable to your SIEM for compliance reviews.

Splunk, Datadog, and Elastic supported.

Compliance Ready

SOC 2 Type II practices by default. HIPAA-aware patterns for healthcare data. FedRAMP-aligned controls when needed.

See AI Governance Consulting for full framework support across NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, EU AI Act, and more.

Proof

We've Shipped This Engineering Pattern Already

MCP was released in November 2024, so no one has years of MCP-branded case studies. What RTS has is 14+ years building exactly the same integration pattern MCP now standardizes — AI connected to enterprise systems, with authentication, multi-tenant safety, and measurable outcomes.

Legal

Preferred Legal Group

AI connected to legal systems for document extraction and drafting — the same engineering pattern as a contract-review MCP server. Built before MCP existed; the same pattern, today implemented through MCP.

120 → 10 Min

drafting time · 91% reduction

Insurance

HSA Trustee

AI customer service connected to policy admin and account systems — the exact use case a claims or service MCP server handles today. Same pattern, now implemented through MCP.

0 %

increase in customer satisfaction

Legal / Real Estate

Commercial Real Estate Contract Analysis

AI connected to a contract repository for multi-document review — the same multi-system connectivity an enterprise MCP server provides.

0 %

better forecast accuracy · 25% less overstocking · 20% fewer disruptions

Why RTS

Why Us

01

We've Built the Systems Your MCP Server Plugs Into

14+ years across Finance, Insurance, Logistics, and Real Estate — Landstar, Dominion Energy, Advance Auto Parts, Goodwill, Centivo, Stovall. Not logos we’d like to work with; work we’ve shipped.

02

Production Discipline, Not Demo Theater

Authentication, tenant separation, monitoring, runbooks. The 80% of MCP work tutorials skip is the 80% your server actually needs to handle real users.

03

We Work in Your Stack, Not Ours

Python, TypeScript, Java, Go, .NET. We meet your team where you already are. We don’t sell a platform you’d have to adopt.

04

We Publish What We Learn

Benchmarks across LLMs, security findings, and real production lessons — original research nobody else in this market is publishing yet.

The Real Choice

Build In-House, or Build With RTS

That is the actual choice. There’s no shame in either direction — but know which one you’re picking.

The DecisionBuild With RTSBuild In-House
Time to Production4–8 weeks3–6 months
What You Own AfterA production server plus complete documentationThe architecture, security layer, monitoring, and runbook — all of it
Security & Multi-TenancyBuilt in from day oneYour team’s responsibility to design and test
Adding New ToolsDays, on the existing serverA new build cycle each time
Spec & Provider UpdatesWe track the standard and updateYou own every update from here forward
leadership

Jyot Singh

Founder & CEO

Founded RTS Labs 14+ years ago. Has led AI and data-engineering engagements across Finance, Logistics, Insurance, and Healthcare for mid-market and enterprise clients.

Alex Hogancamp

Director of AI

Leads AI strategy and LLM engineering at RTS. Designed the Production Sprint methodology and oversees model architecture, evaluation, and governance practices.

Sandhya Ramamurthy

Director of Data Engineering

Leads data platform and pipeline architecture. Specializes in making enterprise data production-ready for AI — the step most projects skip and most projects fail at.

Tech Stack

A Stack as Flexible as Your Team's

We work with the tools your team already uses. These categories show the full set RTS delivers across.

Languages
Python (FastMCP)TypeScript (MCP SDK)Java (Spring AI MCP)Go.NETRust
LLM Providers
Anthropic ClaudeOpenAIGoogle GeminiAWS BedrockAzure OpenAILlama / Mistral
Transports & Protocols
STDIOHTTP+SSEWebSocketJSON-RPC 2.0OAuth 2.1
Cloud & Infrastructure
AWSAzureGCPDockerKubernetesTerraform
Observability
DatadogGrafanaSplunk
Security & Compliance
VantaDrataServiceNow GRC
Client Voices

What Clients Actually Say

★★★★★

“RTS Labs has been an invaluable partner in our journey. Their expertise and ability to understand our vision allowed them to deliver innovative, AI-powered solutions that align perfectly with our goals. Their collaborative approach and commitment to excellence have transformed how we operate, driving efficiency and unlocking new opportunities. We couldn’t have asked for a better partner.”

Jason Herzog

Founder, Holon Health
★★★★★

“RTS Labs became an extension of our team, delivering AI solutions that transformed how we operate. Their understanding of our needs and collaborative approach unlocked opportunities we hadn’t imagined. Truly a game changer for our business.”

Gemma Brooks

COO, BlueOceanBrain (an HSI Company)
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?

MCP is an open standard for connecting AI assistants to external systems and data sources. It defines a common format for how AI applications request information or take actions, and how servers respond. Before MCP, connecting AI to a new system meant writing custom integration code for each combination of AI model and system. MCP standardizes that layer, so any AI assistant that supports MCP can work with any MCP server, regardless of who built either one.

Who created MCP, and is it an open standard?

Anthropic released MCP as an open standard in November 2024 and published the specification publicly. OpenAI and Google have since adopted the protocol, confirming its status as an industry standard rather than a proprietary tool. The specification is maintained at modelcontextprotocol.io and is available for anyone to implement.

What is the difference between MCP and a traditional API?

A traditional API is built for software-to-software communication: a developer writes code that calls specific endpoints in a predictable way. MCP is built for AI-to-system communication — the AI decides which tools to use, when, and how to interpret the results. The key difference is that MCP includes semantic descriptions of what each tool does, letting an AI reason about which tool to call without a developer hardcoding the logic. APIs still sit behind the MCP server in most implementations; MCP is a layer on top.

What is the difference between MCP and RAG?

RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) gives an AI access to a knowledge base, usually by embedding documents and retrieving relevant chunks by semantic similarity. MCP gives an AI the ability to take actions and access live data — look up a record, run a query, update a field, send a message. The two are complementary: you might use RAG for a policy library and MCP for live account data. Many production AI systems use both.

What programming languages support MCP server development?

The MCP specification has official SDKs for Python and TypeScript. RTS also works in Java (Spring AI MCP), Go, .NET, and Rust. The right choice depends on your existing infrastructure and team — if your backend is Python, we build in Python; if your team runs TypeScript, we build in TypeScript. We don’t require you to adopt a new language or framework.

What is the difference between local (STDIO) and remote (HTTP+SSE) MCP servers?

A local MCP server runs on the same machine as the AI client and communicates over standard input/output (STDIO) — simple to set up and common in tools like Cursor and Claude Desktop. A remote MCP server runs as a separate service over HTTP with server-sent events (SSE). Remote servers are required for multi-user production deployments because they run continuously, support many users at once, and can be deployed with proper authentication and access controls. Most enterprise use cases require remote HTTP+SSE servers.

How long does it take to build a production MCP server?

A focused, single-system server with authentication, a handful of tools, and basic observability typically takes 4–8 weeks from discovery to production. More complex servers — multiple systems, multi-tenant isolation, compliance requirements, custom observability — run longer. The RTS MCP Sprint runs from Discover (weeks 1–2) through Operate (weeks 10–24+). The 2-week MCP Readiness Assessment is the fastest way to get a realistic estimate for your situation.

How much does MCP server development cost?

Costs vary by scope. A 2-week MCP Readiness Assessment typically runs $5,000–$10,000 and produces an architecture decision document and build-vs-buy recommendation. Production MCP server development usually ranges from $25,000 to $100,000, depending on how many systems you’re connecting, your authentication model, multi-tenant requirements, and compliance constraints. Multi-server platform engagements are scoped individually. The best way to get a real number is a conversation about your specific situation.

How do you secure a multi-tenant MCP server?

Multi-tenant security requires that every tool call is scoped to the authenticated user and their tenant context. The server must validate identity and permissions before executing any tool, and the query or action passed to your system must be filtered to that tenant’s data only. A common failure is checking permissions at the application layer but not at the MCP tool layer — which lets one user’s AI session retrieve another user’s data. RTS builds access controls directly into the tool handlers using row-level security patterns at the MCP layer.

Can one MCP server work with Claude, GPT, and Gemini?

Yes — that’s one of the primary benefits of building to the MCP standard rather than integrating with a single provider. Any MCP-compatible client can connect to any MCP-compliant server: Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Cursor, and other MCP-enabled tools can all use the same server without modification. When a new provider adds MCP support, your server works with it immediately.

Let's Talk

Ready to Build?

If your team is hitting integration walls, an MCP server is often the right next step. If you’re not sure yet, the MCP Readiness Assessment is the lowest-risk way to find out what your architecture actually needs.

  • ✓ 2-week MCP Readiness Assessment to scope the work
  • ✓ We work in your stack — Python, TypeScript, Java, Go, .NET
  • ✓ U.S.-based engineers, regulated-industry experience

Trusted by 600+ companies including Dominion Energy, Landstar, Advance Auto Parts, and Goodwill Industries. No spam. We respond within one business day.